The Interpret of the Principle of “Chinese-Style Democracy” in the Xi Jinping Era on the Principles of the Western Neoliberalism
Keywords:
Democracy, Neoliberalism, Chinese-tyle Democracy, Xi Jinping EraAbstract
This research constitutes a qualitative inquiry, employing a methodology reliant on the examination of pertinent academic literature to conduct analysis and draw conclusions. Its primary objective is to investigate the evolution and tenets of neoliberal democracy, the principles of “Chinese-Style Democracy” during the tenure of Xi Jinping, and the interpretation thereof. This inquiry seeks to juxtapose the principles of “Chinese-Style Democracy” during Xi Jinping's era with those of neoliberal democracy prevalent in the Western world, across three distinct perspectives: economic, societal, and international political realms.
The study found that democracy becomes the best democracy when all interests taken by the government as a representative of the people are acutely distributed to all people, not taken by a few groups. The interpretation of the principle of “Chinese-Style Democracy” in the Xi Jinping era on the principles of the western Neoliberalism, are both similar and different perspectives as the result of historical context, economics, politics, and diversity of cultures.
Therefore, Firstly, economic perspective, China agrees with the free market as a tool for developing country, they encourage ownership of capital, and the right to manage resources but also control property and resource accumulation as individuals. However, the government should play a role in economic activities and interference in some part of economic to ensure that all people receive basic social welfare and social security. Next, social perspective, Neoliberal democracy focuses on rights, freedom, and the pursuit of opportunities from individual abilities, social development is driven by democracy. However, China uses democracy as a tool to solve social problems. China's democracy is representative of the people who truly care about the interests of the people. Developing society to improve equality in society, the development is also adaptable to social change. In the view of public interest, people should have equal opportunities to access, rather than individual abilities. People have rights and freedoms within an appropriate framework. Lastly, the international political perspective, in the point of view of China found that the quest to determine whether a country is a true democracy should be judged by the standards of its people based on the rule of law. Democracy in practice and respect for other people's democratic as well.
References
Atthakorn, W. (2019). “Dr. Wiwatchai” warns the government to stick to the theory “Neoliberalism” beware of bringing the nation down [“ดร.วิวัฒน์ชัย” เตือนรัฐบาลยึดทฤษฎี “เสรีนิยมใหม่” ระวังพาชาติล่ม]. https://mgronline.com/onlinesection/detail/9620000111204
(in Thai)
Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Chanwit, P. (2010). Alternative economy: On measures to regulate and manage international capital flows. Bangkok: Open Books. (in Thai)
China Daily. (2019). Institutional advantages of socialist market economy. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1645261713315617123&wfr=spider&for=pc (in Chinese)
China’s State Council Information Office. (2021). China: Democracy that works. http://www.news.cn/english/2021-12/04/c_1310351231.htm
Council of Euroupe Portal. (n.d.). Democracy. https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/democracy
Dabphet, S. (2017). Chinese leaders’ thoughts and changes in China during the cultural revolution and reform period [ความคิดของผู้นำจีนและการเปลี่ยนแปลงในประเทศจีนในช่วงการปฏิวัติวัฒนธรรมและช่วงการปฏิรูป]. Journal of Social Science, Srinakharinwirot University, 20, 257-270. (in Thai)
Dewey, J. (2009). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Fang, N. (2021). China’s experience on democracy (Trans. by Yuwadee Kadklankhai).
Samut Songkhram: Creative Intelligence.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
He, J. (2022). The Patterns of Democracy in Context of Historical Political Science. Chinese Political Science Review, 7, 111–139.
Irwin, D. A. & Ward, O. (2021). What is the “Washington Consensus?”. PETERSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS. https://www.piie.com/blogs/ realtime-economic-issues-watch/what-washington-consensus.
Jiujiang Newspaper. (2022). Jiang Zemin’s great and glorious life. http://jjrb.jjxw.cn/html/
-12/03/content_85762_15570333.htm. (in Chinese)
Kanchuchat, W. (2017). From old liberalism to new liberalism – where is the Thai state? [จากเสรีนิยมเก่าสู่เสรีนิยมใหม่ – รัฐไทยอยู่ตรงไหน]. https://www.the101.world/the-liberal-thai-state/(in Thai)
Ketbunchu, K. (2013). The internationalization of capitalism and neoliberalism [ความเป็นสากลของทุนนิยมและเสรีนิยมใหม่]. Journal of Social Sciences, 43(2), 7-43. (in Thai)
Khemphon, P. (2015). Democracy and foreign policy [ประชาธิปไตยและนโยบายต่างประเทศ]. Bangkok: Constitutional Court of Thailand. (in Thai)
Kitirianglarp, K. (2006). Neoliberalism, why is it so bad for education? [เสรีนิยมใหม่ ทำไมมันจึงเลวร้ายสำหรับการศึกษา?]. http://www.ftawatch.org/node/10342 (in Thai)
Kunakornprateep, P. (2022). Using technology for society development in Xi Jinping, the dragon above the dragon [การใช้เทคโนโลยีเพื่อพัฒนาสังคม ของสี จิ้นผิง มังกรเหนือมังกร]. Bangkok: Saengdao. (in Thai)
Lancang-Mekong Cooperation China Secretariat. (2022). Analysis: China attaches great importance to respecting and ensuring human rights [บทวิเคราะห์: จีนให้ความสําคัญอย่างยิ่งต่อการเคารพและประกันสิทธิมนุษยชน]. http://www.lmcchina.org/tha/2022-03/04/ content_41893387.html (in Thai)
Lincoln, A. (n.d.) The gettysburg address. https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/ gettysburg.htm
Locke, J. (1962). Two treatises of government. https://www.yorku.ca/comninel/courses/3025pdf/
Locke.pdf.
Mahatthanobon, W. (2021). China party-leader-state power [พรรค-ผู้นำ-อำนาจรัฐของจีน]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Mike, B. (1904). On new democracy. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_26.htm9620000111204
Monbiot, G. (2007). How the neoliberals stitched up the wealth of nations for themselves. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/aug/28/comment.
businesscomment
Nakprachchayachaikhob. (2009). Everyone must be equal on the “freedom of thought” [บน “เวทีเสรีภาพทางความคิด” ทุกคนต้องเท่าเทียม]. Prachatai. https://prachatai.com/journal/ 2009/06/24634 (in Thai)
Nithiveerakul, N. (2018). US-China trade war on the main point of neoliberalism [สงครามการค้าจีน-สหรัฐ บนหัวใจเสรีนิยมใหม่]. https://waymagazine.org/china_us_liberal_ economics/
(in Thai)
ÖZSOY, S. (2009). “Turkish modernization,” democracy, and education: An analysis from Dewey’s perspective, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(4), 1925-1931.
Phelan, S., & Dawes, S. (2018). Liberalism and neoliberalism, communication.https://doi.org/
1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.176.
Qiu, P. (2022). The value advantages of the Chinese-style democracy and its intrinsic mechanism. Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Jinggangshan, 15(5), 83-90. (in Chinese)
Shanghai Cooperation Organization Secretariat. (n.d.). The Shanghai cooperation organisation. http://eng.sectsco.org/about_sco/20170109/190857.html.
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1994). The politics of market socialism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 165-176.
Sitthi, K. (2008). The theories about internayional relationship theories [ทฤษฎีเกี่ยวกับความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างประเทศ]. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (in Thai)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2020). Locke’s political philosophy. https://plato.stanford. edu/entries/locke-political/
Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2021). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (n.d.). Economy crisis in 1930 century [วิกฤตเศรษฐกิจในศตวรรษที่ 1930]. https://www.stou.ac.th/stouonline/lom/data/sec/Lom6/01-03.html. (in Thai)
Suttinipaphan, D. (2017). Democratic principles rights and freedoms in a pluralistic society [หลักการประชาธิปไตย สิทธิและเสรีภาพในสังคมพหุลักษณ์]. Bangkok: Constitutional Court of Thailand. (in Thai)
Tejapira, K. (2019). Neoliberalism: Conceptual background and history of political economy [เสรีนิยมใหม่: ภูมิหลังทางแนวคิดและประวัติเศรษฐกิจการเมือง]. https://www.matichonweekly.com/ column/article_223879 (in Thai)
Thaipost. (2021). Chinese democracy: That's work [ประชาธิปไตยจีน ประชาธิปไตยที่ใช้การได้จริง]. https://www.thaipost.net/columnist-people/43449/ (in Thai)
Thammabutsadee, S. (2018). Neoliberalism and the creation of otherness: A case study of contemporary marginalization [เสรีนิยมใหม่กับการสร้างความเป็นอื่น: กรณีศึกษาการขยายตัวของกลุ่มคนชายขอบร่วมสมัย]. https://roottogether.net/leader/the-classroom/เสรีนิยมใหม่กับการสร้า/ (in Thai)
Torsak, J. (2016). What's ‘new’ in neoliberalism: An analysis of social life and its impact on democracy [มีอะไร 'ใหม่' ในเสรีนิยมใหม่: บทวิเคราะห์ชีวิตทางสังคมและผลกระทบต่อระบอบประชาธิปไตย]. Prachatai. https://prachatai.com/journal/2016/07/66824 (in Thai)
United Nations. (2007). Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 8 November 2007: Support by the United Nations system of the efforts of Governments to promote and consolidate new or restored democracies. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/ 464/19/PDF/N0746419.pdf?OpenElement.
Wongchaisuwan, T. (2003). Government reform: By applying contemporary administrative technology [การปฏิรูประบบราชการ: โดยใช้เทคโนโลยีการบริหารร่วมสมัย]. Bangkok: Thammasat University. (in Thai)