The Development of Teaching Process by using Blended Learning in Elementary Chinese 2 course for Students Majoring in Teaching Chinese Language
Keywords:
Blended learning, Teaching Chinese Language, Program EvaluationAbstract
This research has two objectives 1) To study blended learning results of Elementary Chinese 2 for students majoring in Teaching Chinese Language and 2) To assess the process of blended learning management in Elementary Chinese 2 class by experts and stakeholder. Study participants consist of 92 Teaching Chinese Language major students, 5 lecturers and 5 experts. This study collected data by using 4 choices achievement test and the evaluation form with 5 rating scales. The qualitative data are analyzed by Content analysis, and quantitative data are analyzed by using median (Mdn), interquartile range (IQR), mean(M), standard deviation (SD) and percentage (%).
The result of The Development of Teaching Process by using Blended Learning for students majoring in Teaching Chinese Language reveals that the blended learning management process was evaluated by students, the lecturers and the experts, and passed the assessment criteria. There is a consensus opinion that the learning management process is a process that has accuracy standard, propriety Standard, feasibility standard, and utility standard.
References
Allen. I. E. & Seaman. J. (2007). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, The Sloan Consortium. http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/ pdf/ growing_by_ degrees.pdf.
Birko S, Dove ES, & Özdemir V. (2015). Evaluation of nine consensus indices in Delphi foresight research and their dependency on Delphi survey characteristics: A simulation study and debate on Delphi design and interpretation. PLOS ONE, 10(8),
-199.
Fangkamol Phetkliang. (2020). Blended Learning. Journal of Early Childhood Education Management, 2(2), 68-79.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, 1, 3-21.
Horn. B.M. & Staker. H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Unpublished Paper: Innosight Institute. JCSEE. (2010). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612-617.
Laster, S., Otte, G., Picciano, A. G., & Sorg, S. (2005). Redefining blended learning.
Lee, S. H., & Lee, J. H. (2007). Blended learning revisited: A new approach to foreign language education. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 10(2), 142-157.
Mae Fah Luang University. (2012). Development planning of Mae Fah Luang University stage 3 (2012-2016). Chiang Rai: Mae Fah Luang University
Ministry of Education. (2014). Ministry of Education’s announcement for teaching Chinese language revolution. Bangkok: Kurusapa Printing Ladphrao.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-33.
Panita Wannapiroon. (2008). Development of blended learning model via social network by using case-based learning on video sharing for developing critical thinking skills. (Master thesis). Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University.
Peters, M. (2009). Executing blended learning. Retrieved July, 31, 2012.
Persai, D., Panda, R., Kumar, R., & Mc Ewen, A. (2016). Delphi study for setting up tobacco research and practice network in India. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 14(4), 78-97.
Picciano, A. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 5(1), 4-14.
Picciano, A. (2020). Bachelor of Education Program in Teaching Chinese Language Standard 2020.(Report). Chiang Rai: Division of Quality Assurance and Curriculum Development, Mae Fah Luang University.
Tan Yongping. (2018). Basic blended learning theory and using. Professional Technical Education, 32, 5-9.
