Role Model of “Good” or “Highly Esteemed" People in the Chinese Didactic Literary Work “Caigen tan” and the Thai Didactic Literary Work “Klong Lokanitti”

A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Srisupang THANAWATSATCHASERI Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Suree CHOONHARUANDEJ Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Caigen tan, Klong Lokanitti, role model, pundit, junzi

Abstract

This article aims to study and compare the similarities and differences between the characteristics of junzi and “(nak) prat/pundit” as used in the didactic literary works Caigen tan and Klong Lokanitti respectively.  The results find that the two terms are quite similar regarding their personality traits, that is, being a person of thinking and wisdom, morality, honesty, etc.  In terms of their differences, due to the influence of three lines of philosophical thought, namely Confucius, Taoism, and Buddhism in Chinese society, and the influence of Buddhist doctrines in Thai society, it may be divided into 3 points, namely: 1) Chinese society emphasizes teaching principles of conduct for the peaceful coexistence of people in society according to Confucius' guidelines, regardless of one’s family background, whereas in Thai society, some people still believe that being a pundit runs in the family. It is innate wisdom without being taught by anyone; 2) Chinese society emphasizes living a simple, moderate way of life following the Taoist principles, whereas Thai society emphasizes knowing how to assess people and how to behave ourselves; 3) Chinese society emphasizes letting go and not be attached to all things following the Zen Buddhist philosophy, whereas Thai society emphasizes faith in the Dhamma and the learning and seeking of Dhamma teachings.  Therefore, it may be concluded that the good role models that are admirable in both works are similar in essence, with only minor differences in details.

References

Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. (1987). Wei Lang Sutra. Bangkok: Thai Quality Books. (In Thai)

Caigen Tan quanwen ji yiwen [The full text and translation of Caigen Tan]. (2019, January 15).

SOHU.com. https://www.sohu.com/a/289233690_120046706?from= singlemessage & isappinstalled=0 (In Chinese)

Chunlawong, S. (2007). Worldview in Khlong Lokanitti. Vannavidas, 7, 127-152. (In Thai)

Daodejing [The Book of The Way]. (n.d.). Baidu Hanyu.https://hanyu.baidu.com/shici/detail

?anchor=yiwen&from=aladdin&pid=247de09646ac9b265ae504216168e3f0 (In Chinese)

Kocharat, S. (2007). Narangkurowat: A study of didactic literature [master’s project]. Srinakharinwirot University. (In Thai)

Kotphuton, K., & Chaitawip, C. (2014). A study of Confucius principle of ethics. Academic Journal BangkokThonburi University, 3(2), 12-24. (In Thai)

Lompattaya, W. (2013). The noble man and the imaginative power: An analysis of construction of the ren (humanness) community in the Analects. Studies in the Field of Humanities [Special issue], 20, 276-311. (In Thai)

Lunyu quanwen [Full text of the Analects]. (n.d.). Lunyu Wang. http://www.lunyu8.cn/ (In Chinese)

Phatthong, S. (2002). Khlong Lokanitti Immortal didactic literature. Vannavidas, 2, 64-80. (In Thai)

Phetnachak, N. (2000). An analytical study of Buddhist principles and the methods of teaching in Khlong Lokaniitti [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Mahidol University. (In Thai)

Phra Ittiphon Ittiyano. (2015). The concept of morality in Confucian philosophy. Phimoldhamma research Institute Journal, 2(2), 63-69. (In Thai)

Phra Paisan Visalo. (2014, June). Following the footsteps of Weilang.

HTTPS://WWW.VISALO.ORG/ARTICLE/SARAKADEE255706.HTM (In Thai)

Phra Srirattanobon. (2017). Analysis of Khlong Lokanitti according to Buddhist social philosophy. Journal of Graduate Studies Review, 13(1), 157-167. (In Thai)

Prangwattanakul, S. (1976). Analysis of Lanna literature about Chao Witun teaching his grandchildren and Phra Lo teaching the world [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Srinakharinwirot University. (In Thai)

Si, L. (2015). Caigen tan quanjie. [Complete explanation of Caigen tan]. Beijing: Beijing lianhe chuban gongsi. (In Chinese)

Sta-anan, S. (2012). Lunyu: Confucius conversation. Bangkok: Openbooks (TH). (In Thai)

Suzuki, D.T. (1970). Essays in Zen Buddhism, second series (The complete works of D.T. Suzuki). London: Rider and Company.

Tangruanrat, K. (2011). The similar concept of Tao philosophy and Zen philosophy: A comparative study [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Kasetsart University. (In Thai)

Tangtrongchit, K. (2005). Describing the meaning of Khlong Lokaniitti. Bangkok: Bhannakij Book Store. (In Thai)

Thanawatsatchaseri, S., & Choonharuangdej, S. (2020). An analysis of the teaching of Moral self-cultivation in Chinese didactic literature Caigen Tan. Journal of Sinology, 14, 1-36. (In Thai)

Thasukhon, S. (2016). The ideas of Confucius for happy society. Ramkhamhaeng University Journal Humanities Edition, 35(1), 65-88. (In Thai)

Tungpongthiti, W. (2013). Klong Lokkanit: The stream of morality. Journal of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, 13(1), 33-49. (In Thai)

Vichanati, J. (2017). The integration of Zen technics to withhold the Anusaya. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 5(2), 181-189. (In Thai)

Wu, J.J. (2013). Xin shi Caigen tan. [New interpretation of Caigen tan]. Taipei: Sanmin shuju. (In Chinese)

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

THANAWATSATCHASERI, S., & CHOONHARUANDEJ, S. (2024). Role Model of “Good” or “Highly Esteemed" People in the Chinese Didactic Literary Work “Caigen tan” and the Thai Didactic Literary Work “Klong Lokanitti”: A Comparative Study. Journal of Sinology, 18(1), 74–91. Retrieved from https://journal.mfu.ac.th/index.php/jsino/article/view/148

Issue

Section

Research Articles